Rwanda vs East Timor: Share of cereals allocated to industrial uses
Rwanda
0.0%
in 2023
East Timor
0.0%
in 2023
Rwanda rank
138th
East Timor rank
138th
Share of cereals allocated to industrial uses over time
- Rwanda
- East Timor
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in East Timor, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 59 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 138th and East Timor ranks 138th of 181 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 1970s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 1980s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 1990s | 0.0% | 8.7% | 8.7% | East Timor |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of cereals allocated to industrial uses, Rwanda or East Timor?
- Rwanda, at 0.0% against 0.0% in East Timor as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of cereals allocated to industrial uses between Rwanda and East Timor?
- 0.0%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and East Timor?
- 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Rwanda and East Timor rank globally for share of cereals allocated to industrial uses?
- Rwanda ranks 138th and East Timor ranks 138th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Share of cereals allocated to industrial uses. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of cereals available for domestic consumption – after accounting for trade – that is allocated to other purposes (primarily industrial uses such as biofuel production), relative to the total allocated to human food, animal feed, and other uses. This excludes cereals used for seed, processing, and losses.