Botswana vs New Caledonia: Share of cereals allocated to industrial uses
Botswana
0.0%
in 2018
New Caledonia
0.0%
in 2023
Botswana rank
138th
New Caledonia rank
138th
Share of cereals allocated to industrial uses over time
- Botswana
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 54 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 138th and New Caledonia ranks 138th of 181 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0% | 19.2% | 19.2% | New Caledonia |
| 1970s | 0.5% | 15.4% | 14.9% | New Caledonia |
| 1980s | 1.6% | 16.9% | 15.3% | New Caledonia |
| 1990s | 1.0% | 30.4% | 29.5% | New Caledonia |
| 2000s | 0.4% | 36.1% | 35.6% | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of cereals allocated to industrial uses, Botswana or New Caledonia?
- Botswana, at 0.0% against 0.0% in New Caledonia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in share of cereals allocated to industrial uses between Botswana and New Caledonia?
- 0.0%, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and New Caledonia?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2018.
- How do Botswana and New Caledonia rank globally for share of cereals allocated to industrial uses?
- Botswana ranks 138th and New Caledonia ranks 138th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Share of cereals allocated to industrial uses. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of cereals available for domestic consumption – after accounting for trade – that is allocated to other purposes (primarily industrial uses such as biofuel production), relative to the total allocated to human food, animal feed, and other uses. This excludes cereals used for seed, processing, and losses.