Namibia vs Saudi Arabia: Share of cereals allocated to animal feed
Namibia
50.3%
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
48.6%
in 2023
Namibia rank
60th
Saudi Arabia rank
62nd
Share of cereals allocated to animal feed over time
- Namibia
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 50.3% against 48.6% in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 1.7%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Namibia ranks 60th and Saudi Arabia ranks 62nd of 192 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.5% | 9.6% | 8.2% | Saudi Arabia |
| 1970s | 1.1% | 17.4% | 16.3% | Saudi Arabia |
| 1980s | 0.8% | 64.7% | 63.9% | Saudi Arabia |
| 1990s | 13.8% | 59.9% | 46.1% | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 10.1% | 60.8% | 50.7% | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 39.6% | 64.6% | 25.0% | Saudi Arabia |
| 2020s | 43.9% | 57.2% | 13.3% | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of cereals allocated to animal feed, Namibia or Saudi Arabia?
- Namibia, at 50.3% against 48.6% in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of cereals allocated to animal feed between Namibia and Saudi Arabia?
- 1.7%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Saudi Arabia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Namibia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for share of cereals allocated to animal feed?
- Namibia ranks 60th and Saudi Arabia ranks 62nd of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Share of cereals allocated to animal feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of cereals available for domestic use β after accounting for trade β that is allocated to animal feed, relative to the total used for human food, animal feed, and industrial purposes. This excludes cereals used for seed, processing, and losses.