Hong Kong vs Zimbabwe: Share of cereals allocated to animal feed
Hong Kong
11.6%
in 2023
Zimbabwe
11.9%
in 2023
Hong Kong rank
143rd
Zimbabwe rank
140th
Share of cereals allocated to animal feed over time
- Hong Kong
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 11.9% against 11.6% in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 143rd and Zimbabwe ranks 140th of 192 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.1% | 13.8% | 5.7% | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 17.1% | 19.2% | 2.1% | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 16.6% | 14.9% | 1.7% | Hong Kong |
| 1990s | 1.4% | 11.3% | 9.9% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 5.1% | 6.9% | 1.9% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 6.9% | 15.1% | 8.2% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 9.5% | 14.5% | 5.1% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of cereals allocated to animal feed, Hong Kong or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 11.9% against 11.6% in Hong Kong as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of cereals allocated to animal feed between Hong Kong and Zimbabwe?
- 0.3%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Hong Kong and Zimbabwe rank globally for share of cereals allocated to animal feed?
- Hong Kong ranks 143rd and Zimbabwe ranks 140th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Share of cereals allocated to animal feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of cereals available for domestic use β after accounting for trade β that is allocated to animal feed, relative to the total used for human food, animal feed, and industrial purposes. This excludes cereals used for seed, processing, and losses.