Egypt vs Eswatini: Share of cereals allocated to animal feed
Egypt
23.5%
in 2023
Eswatini
24.0%
in 2023
Egypt rank
121st
Eswatini rank
119th
Share of cereals allocated to animal feed over time
- Egypt
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 24.0% against 23.5% in Egypt, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.
Egypt ranks 121st and Eswatini ranks 119th of 192 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 5 and Eswatini in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17.9% | 21.4% | 3.5% | Eswatini |
| 1970s | 19.0% | 22.9% | 3.9% | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 21.7% | 15.5% | 6.2% | Egypt |
| 1990s | 24.4% | 15.8% | 8.6% | Egypt |
| 2000s | 32.6% | 16.9% | 15.7% | Egypt |
| 2010s | 34.3% | 24.1% | 10.2% | Egypt |
| 2020s | 24.5% | 22.0% | 2.5% | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of cereals allocated to animal feed, Egypt or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 24.0% against 23.5% in Egypt as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of cereals allocated to animal feed between Egypt and Eswatini?
- 0.5%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Eswatini?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Egypt and Eswatini rank globally for share of cereals allocated to animal feed?
- Egypt ranks 121st and Eswatini ranks 119th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Share of cereals allocated to animal feed. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of cereals available for domestic use β after accounting for trade β that is allocated to animal feed, relative to the total used for human food, animal feed, and industrial purposes. This excludes cereals used for seed, processing, and losses.