Melanesia vs Viet Nam: SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture value
SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture value over time
- Melanesia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Melanesia currently reports 14.38 % against 11.96 % in Viet Nam, a difference of 2.42 %.
That makes Melanesia's figure about 1.2 times Viet Nam's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Melanesia ranks 9th and Viet Nam ranks 11th of 19 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Melanesia averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Melanesia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.99 % | 18.63 % | 5.64 % | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 13.49 % | 14.32 % | 0.836 % | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 14.78 % | 12.29 % | 2.49 % | Melanesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture value, Melanesia or Viet Nam?
- Melanesia, at 14.38 % against 11.96 % in Viet Nam as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture value between Melanesia and Viet Nam?
- 2.42 %, with Melanesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and Viet Nam?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Melanesia and Viet Nam rank globally for sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture value?
- Melanesia ranks 9th and Viet Nam ranks 11th of 19 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture value added share of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.