Melanesia vs Southern Asia: SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture value
SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture value over time
- Melanesia
- Southern Asia
How they compare
Southern Asia currently reports 16.01 % against 14.38 % in Melanesia, a difference of 1.63 %.
That makes Southern Asia's figure about 1.1 times Melanesia's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Southern Asia has been ahead every year.
Melanesia ranks 9th and Southern Asia ranks 6th of 19 countries.
Southern Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Melanesia | Southern Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.33 % | 16.4 % | 3.07 % | Southern Asia |
| 2010s | 13.49 % | 15.62 % | 2.13 % | Southern Asia |
| 2020s | 14.7 % | 16.44 % | 1.74 % | Southern Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture value, Melanesia or Southern Asia?
- Southern Asia, at 16.01 % against 14.38 % in Melanesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture value between Melanesia and Southern Asia?
- 1.63 %, with Southern Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and Southern Asia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Melanesia and Southern Asia rank globally for sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture value?
- Melanesia ranks 9th and Southern Asia ranks 6th of 19 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture value added share of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.