Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Micronesia (Federated States of): SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture value

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
24.13 %
in 2024
Micronesia (Federated States of)
22.1 %
in 2020
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
2nd
Micronesia (Federated States of) rank
3rd

SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture value over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Micronesia (Federated States of)
0102030200120122024

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 24.13 % against 22.1 % in Micronesia (Federated States of), a difference of 2.03 %.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 1.1 times Micronesia (Federated States of)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Micronesia (Federated States of) ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 2nd and Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 3rd of 36 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Micronesia (Federated States of) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Micronesia (Federated States of) Difference Ahead
2000s 23.53 % 25.62 % 2.09 % Micronesia (Federated States of)
2010s 23.96 % 25.73 % 1.77 % Micronesia (Federated States of)
2020s 25.57 % 22.1 % 3.47 % Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture value, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Micronesia (Federated States of)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 24.13 % against 22.1 % in Micronesia (Federated States of) as of 2024.
What is the difference in sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture value between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Micronesia (Federated States of)?
2.03 %, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Micronesia (Federated States of)?
13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2020.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Micronesia (Federated States of) rank globally for sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture value?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 2nd and Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 3rd of 36 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture value added share of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Micronesia (Federated States of): SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-2-a-1-highest-government-level-sdg-2-a-1-agriculture-value-added-share-of-gdp/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/micronesia-federated-states-of/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sdg-2-a-1-highest-government-level-sdg-2-a-1-agriculture-value-added-share-of-gdp/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/micronesia-federated-states-of/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Micronesia (Federated States of): SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture value added share of GDP
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 5,010 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.