Central Asia and Southern Asia vs Micronesia: SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture value
SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture value over time
- Central Asia and Southern Asia
- Micronesia
How they compare
Micronesia currently reports 16.52 % against 15.47 % in Central Asia and Southern Asia, a difference of 1.05 %.
That makes Micronesia's figure about 1.1 times Central Asia and Southern Asia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Central Asia and Southern Asia ahead.
Central Asia and Southern Asia ranks 9th and Micronesia ranks 7th of 36 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Central Asia and Southern Asia averaged higher in 1 and Micronesia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia and Southern Asia | Micronesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.35 % | 14.73 % | 1.62 % | Central Asia and Southern Asia |
| 2010s | 15.26 % | 16.43 % | 1.17 % | Micronesia |
| 2020s | 15.98 % | 16.74 % | 0.758 % | Micronesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture value, Central Asia and Southern Asia or Micronesia?
- Micronesia, at 16.52 % against 15.47 % in Central Asia and Southern Asia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture value between Central Asia and Southern Asia and Micronesia?
- 1.05 %, with Micronesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Southern Asia and Micronesia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Central Asia and Southern Asia and Micronesia rank globally for sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture value?
- Central Asia and Southern Asia ranks 9th and Micronesia ranks 7th of 36 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture value added share of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.