Brunei Darussalam vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture value
SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture value over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 1.22 % against 1.2 % in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 0.02 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 154th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 153rd of 178 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brunei Darussalam averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.09 % | 1.66 % | 0.57 % | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 1.08 % | 0.872 % | 0.208 % | Brunei Darussalam |
| 2020s | 1.19 % | 1.24 % | 0.044 % | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture value, Brunei Darussalam or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 1.22 % against 1.2 % in Brunei Darussalam as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture value between Brunei Darussalam and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.02 %, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture value?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 154th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 153rd of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture value added share of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.