Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand: SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture value
SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture value over time
- Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
- Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand
How they compare
Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand currently reports 14.31 % against 10.01 % in Bolivia (Plurinational State of), a difference of 4.3 %.
That makes Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.4 times Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand ahead.
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 14th and Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand ranks 11th of 19 countries.
Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture value, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand?
- Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand, at 14.31 % against 10.01 % in Bolivia (Plurinational State of) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture value between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand?
- 4.3 %, with Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2007.
- How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand rank globally for sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture value?
- Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 14th and Oceania excluding Australia and New Zealand ranks 11th of 19 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture value added share of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.