IDA blend vs South Sudan: Rural population, per unit of GDP
IDA blend
0.0003 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
South Sudan
0.0008 units per US$ of GDP
in 2015
IDA blend rank
12th
South Sudan rank
11th
Rural population, per unit of GDP over time
- IDA blend
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.0008 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP in IDA blend, a difference of 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 2.7 times IDA blend's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
IDA blend ranks 12th and South Sudan ranks 11th of 45 groups.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA blend | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0006 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0006 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rural population, per unit of gdp, IDA blend or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.0008 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP in IDA blend as of 2015.
- What is the difference in rural population, per unit of gdp between IDA blend and South Sudan?
- 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
- How do IDA blend and South Sudan rank globally for rural population, per unit of gdp?
- IDA blend ranks 12th and South Sudan ranks 11th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Rural population, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Rural population divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.