East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Guinea-Bissau: Rural population, per unit of GDP

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau
0.0005 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
27th
Guinea-Bissau rank
25th

Rural population, per unit of GDP over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Guinea-Bissau
00.0030.0050.0070.010.013196019922025

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 13.7 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 56 shared years of data; in 1970 it was East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 27th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 25th of 45 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) averaged higher in 2 and Guinea-Bissau in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0048 units per US$ of GDP 0.0022 units per US$ of GDP 0.0027 units per US$ of GDP East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
1980s 0.0023 units per US$ of GDP 0.0017 units per US$ of GDP 0.0006 units per US$ of GDP East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
1990s 0.0011 units per US$ of GDP 0.0011 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP 0.0014 units per US$ of GDP 0.0011 units per US$ of GDP Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP 0.0008 units per US$ of GDP 0.0008 units per US$ of GDP Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0.0006 units per US$ of GDP 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rural population, per unit of gdp, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2025.
What is the difference in rural population, per unit of gdp between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Guinea-Bissau?
0.0005 units per US$ of GDP, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Guinea-Bissau?
56 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for rural population, per unit of gdp?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 27th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 25th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rural population, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Guinea-Bissau: Rural population, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rural-population-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rural-population-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/guinea-bissau/">East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Guinea-Bissau: Rural population, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rural population, per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 14,741 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Rural population divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.