Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Trinidad and Tobago: Rural population, per square kilometre

Saint Kitts and Nevis
122.83 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
122.75 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
24th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
25th

Rural population, per square kilometre over time

  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Trinidad and Tobago
050100150196119922023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 122.83 units per square kilometre against 122.75 units per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.08 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 24th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 25th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Saint Kitts and Nevis averaged higher in 3 and Trinidad and Tobago in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Kitts and Nevis Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 100.72 units per square kilometre 131.35 units per square kilometre 30.63 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 80.95 units per square kilometre 109.98 units per square kilometre 29.03 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 104.04 units per square kilometre 106.7 units per square kilometre 2.66 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 107.38 units per square kilometre 111.55 units per square kilometre 4.17 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 120.97 units per square kilometre 114.66 units per square kilometre 6.31 units per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 124.25 units per square kilometre 120.75 units per square kilometre 3.5 units per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 123.09 units per square kilometre 122.71 units per square kilometre 0.373 units per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rural population, per square kilometre, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Trinidad and Tobago?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 122.83 units per square kilometre against 122.75 units per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in rural population, per square kilometre between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.08 units per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for rural population, per square kilometre?
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 24th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 25th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rural population, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Trinidad and Tobago: Rural population, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rural-population-per-square-kilometre/st-kitts-and-nevis/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rural-population-per-square-kilometre/st-kitts-and-nevis/trinidad-and-tobago/">Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Trinidad and Tobago: Rural population, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rural population, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rural population divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.