East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Kyrgyzstan: Rural population, per capita

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0.3795 units per person
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan
0.6525 units per person
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
32nd
Kyrgyzstan rank
33rd

Rural population, per capita over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Kyrgyzstan
00.20.40.60.8196019922025

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0.6525 units per person against 0.3795 units per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 0.273 units per person.

That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.7 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 32nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 33rd of 45 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) averaged higher in 4 and Kyrgyzstan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.8151 units per person 0.6398 units per person 0.1753 units per person East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1970s 0.8097 units per person 0.6201 units per person 0.1897 units per person East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1980s 0.7592 units per person 0.6177 units per person 0.1415 units per person East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1990s 0.6937 units per person 0.6351 units per person 0.0586 units per person East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2000s 0.5819 units per person 0.647 units per person 0.065 units per person Kyrgyzstan
2010s 0.4652 units per person 0.649 units per person 0.1838 units per person Kyrgyzstan
2020s 0.3909 units per person 0.6526 units per person 0.2617 units per person Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rural population, per capita, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Kyrgyzstan?
Kyrgyzstan, at 0.6525 units per person against 0.3795 units per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in rural population, per capita between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Kyrgyzstan?
0.273 units per person, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Kyrgyzstan?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for rural population, per capita?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 32nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 33rd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rural population, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Kyrgyzstan: Rural population, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rural-population-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rural-population-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/kyrgyz-republic/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Kyrgyzstan: Rural population, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rural population, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 17,394 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Rural population divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.