Chile vs Serbia: Rural population growth
Chile
-1.2%
in 2025
Serbia
-1.2%
in 2025
Chile rank
173rd
Serbia rank
174th
Rural population growth over time
- Chile
- Serbia
How they compare
Chile currently reports -1.2% against -1.2% in Serbia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 173rd and Serbia ranks 174th of 209 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 6 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -0.7% | -0.9% | 0.2% | Chile |
| 1970s | -1.5% | -0.6% | 0.9% | Serbia |
| 1980s | 0.5% | -0.4% | 0.9% | Chile |
| 1990s | -0.4% | -1.5% | 1.1% | Chile |
| 2000s | 0.4% | -1.2% | 1.6% | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.2% | -1.0% | 1.2% | Chile |
| 2020s | -1.0% | -1.7% | 0.7% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rural population growth, Chile or Serbia?
- Chile, at -1.2% against -1.2% in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in rural population growth between Chile and Serbia?
- 0.0%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Serbia rank globally for rural population growth?
- Chile ranks 173rd and Serbia ranks 174th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Urbanization Prospects, United Nations (UN), published as Rural population growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual rural population growth rate for year t is the exponential rate of growth of midyear rural population from year t-1 to t, expressed as a percentage. Rural population refers to people living in rural areas as defined by national statistical offices. It is calculated as the difference between total population and urban population.