China, mainland vs Republic of Korea: Rubber — Import Quantity

China, mainland
2.47 million t
in 2013
Republic of Korea
396,347 t
in 2013
China, mainland rank
1st
Republic of Korea rank
4th

Rubber — Import Quantity over time

  • China, mainland
  • Republic of Korea
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M196119872013

How they compare

China, mainland currently reports 2.47 million t against 396,347 t in Republic of Korea, a difference of 2.08 million t.

That makes China, mainland's figure about 6.2 times Republic of Korea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, mainland ahead.

China, mainland ranks 1st and Republic of Korea ranks 4th of 149 countries.

China, mainland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, mainland Republic of Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 163,867 t 15,445 t 148,422 t China, mainland
1970s 235,690 t 69,335 t 166,355 t China, mainland
1980s 262,166 t 164,542 t 97,624 t China, mainland
1990s 351,357 t 288,354 t 63,003 t China, mainland
2000s 1.33 million t 348,458 t 982,168 t China, mainland
2010s 2.15 million t 395,850 t 1.76 million t China, mainland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rubber — import quantity, China, mainland or Republic of Korea?
China, mainland, at 2.47 million t against 396,347 t in Republic of Korea as of 2013.
What is the difference in rubber — import quantity between China, mainland and Republic of Korea?
2.08 million t, with China, mainland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, mainland and Republic of Korea?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do China, mainland and Republic of Korea rank globally for rubber — import quantity?
China, mainland ranks 1st and Republic of Korea ranks 4th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rubber — Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, mainland vs Republic of Korea: Rubber — Import Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rubber-import-quantity/china-mainland/republic-of-korea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rubber-import-quantity/china-mainland/republic-of-korea/">China, mainland vs Republic of Korea: Rubber — Import Quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rubber — Import Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
190 places, 9,109 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.