Nigeria vs Poland, Republic of: Rubber β€” Domestic supply quantity

Nigeria
80,142 t
in 2013
Poland, Republic of
102,361 t
in 2013
Nigeria rank
20th
Poland, Republic of rank
19th

Rubber β€” Domestic supply quantity over time

  • Nigeria
  • Poland, Republic of
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119872013

How they compare

Poland, Republic of currently reports 102,361 t against 80,142 t in Nigeria, a difference of 22,219 t.

That makes Poland, Republic of's figure about 1.3 times Nigeria's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland, Republic of ahead.

Nigeria ranks 20th and Poland, Republic of ranks 19th of 151 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Nigeria averaged higher in 2 and Poland, Republic of in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nigeria Poland, Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 2,766 t 39,260 t 36,495 t Poland, Republic of
1970s 20,725 t 58,052 t 37,326 t Poland, Republic of
1980s 29,640 t 40,476 t 10,836 t Poland, Republic of
1990s 49,456 t 27,491 t 21,965 t Nigeria
2000s 101,659 t 71,818 t 29,841 t Nigeria
2010s 84,338 t 100,962 t 16,623 t Poland, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rubber β€” domestic supply quantity, Nigeria or Poland, Republic of?
Poland, Republic of, at 102,361 t against 80,142 t in Nigeria as of 2013.
What is the difference in rubber β€” domestic supply quantity between Nigeria and Poland, Republic of?
22,219 t, with Poland, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Poland, Republic of?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Nigeria and Poland, Republic of rank globally for rubber β€” domestic supply quantity?
Nigeria ranks 20th and Poland, Republic of ranks 19th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rubber β€” Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nigeria vs Poland, Republic of: Rubber β€” Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rubber-domestic-supply-quantity/nigeria/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rubber-domestic-supply-quantity/nigeria/poland/">Nigeria vs Poland, Republic of: Rubber β€” Domestic supply quantity</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rubber β€” Domestic supply quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
193 places, 9,268 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.