Mauritania, Islamic Republic of vs Rwanda: Rubber β€” Domestic supply quantity

Mauritania, Islamic Republic of
25 t
in 2013
Rwanda
24 t
in 2013
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of rank
113th
Rwanda rank
114th

Rubber β€” Domestic supply quantity over time

  • Mauritania, Islamic Republic of
  • Rwanda
050100150200196119872013

How they compare

Mauritania, Islamic Republic of currently reports 25 t against 24 t in Rwanda, a difference of 1 t.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ranks 113th and Rwanda ranks 114th of 151 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritania, Islamic Republic of averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania, Islamic Republic of Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t 0 t 0 t β€”
1970s 0 t 0 t 0 t β€”
1980s 0 t 0 t 0 t β€”
1990s 0 t 0.9 t 0.9 t Rwanda
2000s 23.3 t 6.9 t 16.4 t Mauritania, Islamic Republic of
2010s 20.25 t 11.5 t 8.75 t Mauritania, Islamic Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rubber β€” domestic supply quantity, Mauritania, Islamic Republic of or Rwanda?
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of, at 25 t against 24 t in Rwanda as of 2013.
What is the difference in rubber β€” domestic supply quantity between Mauritania, Islamic Republic of and Rwanda?
1 t, with Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania, Islamic Republic of and Rwanda?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Mauritania, Islamic Republic of and Rwanda rank globally for rubber β€” domestic supply quantity?
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ranks 113th and Rwanda ranks 114th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rubber β€” Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania, Islamic Republic of vs Rwanda: Rubber β€” Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rubber-domestic-supply-quantity/mauritania/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rubber-domestic-supply-quantity/mauritania/rwanda/">Mauritania, Islamic Republic of vs Rwanda: Rubber β€” Domestic supply quantity</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rubber β€” Domestic supply quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
193 places, 9,268 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.