Least Developed Countries vs Poland: Rubber β€” Domestic supply quantity

Least Developed Countries
167,392 t
in 2013
Poland
102,361 t
in 2013
Least Developed Countries rank
9th
Poland rank
19th

Rubber β€” Domestic supply quantity over time

  • Least Developed Countries
  • Poland
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119872013

How they compare

Least Developed Countries currently reports 167,392 t against 102,361 t in Poland, a difference of 65,031 t.

That makes Least Developed Countries's figure about 1.6 times Poland's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.

Least Developed Countries ranks 9th and Poland ranks 19th of 12 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Least Developed Countries averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries Poland Difference Ahead
1960s 8,532 t 39,260 t 30,728 t Poland
1970s 19,456 t 58,052 t 38,595 t Poland
1980s 21,040 t 40,476 t 19,436 t Poland
1990s 17,243 t 27,491 t 10,248 t Poland
2000s 62,084 t 71,818 t 9,734 t Poland
2010s 159,522 t 100,962 t 58,561 t Least Developed Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rubber β€” domestic supply quantity, Least Developed Countries or Poland?
Least Developed Countries, at 167,392 t against 102,361 t in Poland as of 2013.
What is the difference in rubber β€” domestic supply quantity between Least Developed Countries and Poland?
65,031 t, with Least Developed Countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries and Poland?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Least Developed Countries and Poland rank globally for rubber β€” domestic supply quantity?
Least Developed Countries ranks 9th and Poland ranks 19th of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rubber β€” Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries vs Poland: Rubber β€” Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rubber-domestic-supply-quantity/least-developed-countries/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rubber-domestic-supply-quantity/least-developed-countries/poland/">Least Developed Countries vs Poland: Rubber β€” Domestic supply quantity</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rubber β€” Domestic supply quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
193 places, 9,268 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.