Belgium-Luxembourg vs Czechoslovakia: Rubber — Domestic supply quantity

Belgium-Luxembourg
35,679 t
in 1999
Czechoslovakia
31,500 t
in 1992
Belgium-Luxembourg rank
32nd
Czechoslovakia rank
34th

Rubber — Domestic supply quantity over time

  • Belgium-Luxembourg
  • Czechoslovakia
20.0k40.0k60.0k196119801999

How they compare

Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 35,679 t against 31,500 t in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 4,179 t.

That makes Belgium-Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Czechoslovakia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Czechoslovakia ahead.

Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 32nd and Czechoslovakia ranks 34th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium-Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Czechoslovakia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium-Luxembourg Czechoslovakia Difference Ahead
1960s 18,530 t 46,106 t 27,576 t Czechoslovakia
1970s 21,972 t 52,522 t 30,550 t Czechoslovakia
1980s 37,184 t 46,147 t 8,963 t Czechoslovakia
1990s 46,502 t 30,414 t 16,088 t Belgium-Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rubber — domestic supply quantity, Belgium-Luxembourg or Czechoslovakia?
Belgium-Luxembourg, at 35,679 t against 31,500 t in Czechoslovakia as of 1999.
What is the difference in rubber — domestic supply quantity between Belgium-Luxembourg and Czechoslovakia?
4,179 t, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Czechoslovakia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Czechoslovakia rank globally for rubber — domestic supply quantity?
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 32nd and Czechoslovakia ranks 34th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rubber — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium-Luxembourg vs Czechoslovakia: Rubber — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rubber-domestic-supply-quantity/belgium-luxembourg/czechoslovakia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rubber-domestic-supply-quantity/belgium-luxembourg/czechoslovakia/">Belgium-Luxembourg vs Czechoslovakia: Rubber — Domestic supply quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rubber — Domestic supply quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
193 places, 9,268 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.