Rwanda vs Timor-Leste: Roots, Other — Import quantity
Roots, Other — Import quantity over time
- Rwanda
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0 1000 t against 0 1000 t in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0 1000 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Timor-Leste ahead.
Rwanda ranks 41st and Timor-Leste ranks 41st of 176 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Timor-Leste in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.3333 1000 t | 0.1667 1000 t | 0.1667 1000 t | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0 1000 t | 1.33 1000 t | 1.33 1000 t | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher roots, other — import quantity, Rwanda or Timor-Leste?
- Rwanda, at 0 1000 t against 0 1000 t in Timor-Leste as of 2022.
- What is the difference in roots, other — import quantity between Rwanda and Timor-Leste?
- 0 1000 t, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Timor-Leste?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2022.
- How do Rwanda and Timor-Leste rank globally for roots, other — import quantity?
- Rwanda ranks 41st and Timor-Leste ranks 41st of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Roots, Other — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.