Canada vs South Sudan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Production, per capita
Canada
0.1578 t per person
in 2024
South Sudan
0.1477 t per person
in 2024
Canada rank
33rd
South Sudan rank
36th
Roots and Tubers, Total — Production, per capita over time
- Canada
- South Sudan
How they compare
Canada currently reports 0.1578 t per person against 0.1477 t per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0.0101 t per person.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 33rd and South Sudan ranks 36th of 169 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.1536 t per person | 0.0922 t per person | 0.0614 t per person | Canada |
| 2020s | 0.1559 t per person | 0.1453 t per person | 0.0106 t per person | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher roots and tubers, total — production, per capita, Canada or South Sudan?
- Canada, at 0.1578 t per person against 0.1477 t per person in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — production, per capita between Canada and South Sudan?
- 0.0101 t per person, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Canada and South Sudan rank globally for roots and tubers, total — production, per capita?
- Canada ranks 33rd and South Sudan ranks 36th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Roots and Tubers, Total — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.