Australia and New Zealand vs Zimbabwe: Roots and Tubers, Total — Production, annual growth rate

Australia and New Zealand
8.32 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zimbabwe
7.63 % change on previous year
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
39th
Zimbabwe rank
42nd

Roots and Tubers, Total — Production, annual growth rate over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Zimbabwe
-2002040196219932024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 8.32 % change on previous year against 7.63 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.69 % change on previous year.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 32 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 39th and Zimbabwe ranks 42nd of 196 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 6.65 % change on previous year 1.28 % change on previous year 5.37 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand
1970s -0.8457 % change on previous year 1.34 % change on previous year 2.18 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
1980s 3.05 % change on previous year 5.08 % change on previous year 2.03 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
1990s 3.49 % change on previous year 8.03 % change on previous year 4.55 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2000s -0.3002 % change on previous year 8.61 % change on previous year 8.91 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2010s 0.5772 % change on previous year 4.25 % change on previous year 3.67 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2020s 3.7 % change on previous year 9.59 % change on previous year 5.9 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — production, annual growth rate, Australia and New Zealand or Zimbabwe?
Australia and New Zealand, at 8.32 % change on previous year against 7.63 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — production, annual growth rate between Australia and New Zealand and Zimbabwe?
0.69 % change on previous year, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Zimbabwe rank globally for roots and tubers, total — production, annual growth rate?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 39th and Zimbabwe ranks 42nd of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Zimbabwe: Roots and Tubers, Total — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-production-annual-growth-rate/australia-and-new-zealand/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-production-annual-growth-rate/australia-and-new-zealand/zimbabwe/">Australia and New Zealand vs Zimbabwe: Roots and Tubers, Total — Production, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 13,688 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Roots and Tubers, Total — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.