How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Turkmenistan?

33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Pakistan vs Turkmenistan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Pakistan

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Turkmenistan

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Pakistan rank

39th

Turkmenistan rank

38th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Pakistan
Turkmenistan

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Pakistan, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 39th and Turkmenistan ranks 38th of 139 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 2 and Turkmenistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Pakistan	Turkmenistan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Pakistan
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Turkmenistan
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Pakistan
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Turkmenistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Pakistan or Turkmenistan?: Turkmenistan, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Pakistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Pakistan and Turkmenistan?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Turkmenistan?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do Pakistan and Turkmenistan rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Pakistan ranks 39th and Turkmenistan ranks 38th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Turkmenistan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/pakistan/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/pakistan/turkmenistan/">Pakistan vs Turkmenistan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,505 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.