How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Peru?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Pakistan vs Peru: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Pakistan

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Peru

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Pakistan rank

39th

Peru rank

40th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Pakistan
Peru

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Peru, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.

Pakistan ranks 39th and Peru ranks 40th of 139 countries.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Pakistan	Peru	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Peru
1970s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Peru
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Peru
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Peru
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Peru
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Peru
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Pakistan or Peru?: Pakistan, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Peru as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Pakistan and Peru?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Peru?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Pakistan and Peru rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Pakistan ranks 39th and Peru ranks 40th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Peru: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/pakistan/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/pakistan/peru/">Pakistan vs Peru: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,505 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.