How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Paraguay?

45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Namibia vs Paraguay: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Namibia

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Paraguay

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Namibia rank

49th

Paraguay rank

51st

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Namibia
Paraguay

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Paraguay, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Paraguay's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Paraguay ahead.

Namibia ranks 49th and Paraguay ranks 51st of 139 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Paraguay in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Namibia	Paraguay	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Paraguay
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Paraguay
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Paraguay
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Paraguay
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Namibia or Paraguay?: Namibia, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Paraguay as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Namibia and Paraguay?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Paraguay?: 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
How do Namibia and Paraguay rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Namibia ranks 49th and Paraguay ranks 51st of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Paraguay: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/namibia/paraguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/namibia/paraguay/">Namibia vs Paraguay: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,505 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.