How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Rwanda?

34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Mozambique vs Rwanda: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Mozambique

0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Rwanda

0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Mozambique rank

10th

Rwanda rank

12th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Mozambique
Rwanda

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Rwanda, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.8 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Mozambique ahead.

Mozambique ranks 10th and Rwanda ranks 12th of 139 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Mozambique	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0003 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Mozambique
2000s	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0003 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Rwanda
2010s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Rwanda
2020s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Mozambique or Rwanda?: Mozambique, at 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Mozambique and Rwanda?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Rwanda?: 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Mozambique and Rwanda rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Mozambique ranks 10th and Rwanda ranks 12th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Rwanda: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/mozambique/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/mozambique/rwanda/">Mozambique vs Rwanda: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,505 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.