How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Palestine?

29 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Morocco vs Palestine: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Morocco

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Palestine

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2022

Morocco rank

62nd

Palestine rank

65th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Morocco
Palestine

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Palestine, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Morocco's figure about 1.3 times Palestine's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 29 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Palestine ahead.

Morocco ranks 62nd and Palestine ranks 65th of 139 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 2 and Palestine in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Morocco	Palestine	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Palestine
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Palestine
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Morocco
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Morocco or Palestine?: Morocco, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Palestine as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Morocco and Palestine?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Palestine?: 29 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.
How do Morocco and Palestine rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Morocco ranks 62nd and Palestine ranks 65th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Morocco vs Palestine: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/morocco/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/morocco/west-bank-and-gaza/">Morocco vs Palestine: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,505 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.