How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and World?

40 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malawi vs World: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Malawi

0.0005 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

World

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Malawi rank

1st

World rank

1st

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Malawi
World

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.0005 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in World, a difference of 0.0005 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Malawi's figure about 239.1 times World's.

Across all 40 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 1st and World ranks 1st of 139 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malawi	World	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malawi
1990s	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malawi
2000s	0.0004 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0004 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malawi
2010s	0.0004 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0004 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malawi
2020s	0.0004 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0004 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Malawi or World?: Malawi, at 0.0005 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in World as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Malawi and World?: 0.0005 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and World?: 40 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
How do Malawi and World rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Malawi ranks 1st and World ranks 1st of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs World: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/malawi/world/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/malawi/world/">Malawi vs World: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,505 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.