How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and New Zealand?

30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Lithuania vs New Zealand: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Lithuania

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

New Zealand

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Lithuania rank

104th

New Zealand rank

101st

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Lithuania
New Zealand

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Lithuania, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 104th and New Zealand ranks 101st of 139 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Lithuania	New Zealand	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Lithuania
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Lithuania
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Lithuania
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Lithuania or New Zealand?: New Zealand, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Lithuania as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Lithuania and New Zealand?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and New Zealand?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Lithuania and New Zealand rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Lithuania ranks 104th and New Zealand ranks 101st of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs New Zealand: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/lithuania/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/lithuania/new-zealand/">Lithuania vs New Zealand: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,505 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.