How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Zimbabwe?

45 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Kenya vs Zimbabwe: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Kenya

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Zimbabwe

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Kenya rank

34th

Zimbabwe rank

33rd

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Kenya
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Kenya, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kenya ahead.

Kenya ranks 34th and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 139 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Kenya	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Kenya
1970s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Kenya
1980s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Kenya
1990s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Kenya
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Kenya
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Kenya or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Kenya as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Kenya and Zimbabwe?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Zimbabwe?: 45 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Kenya and Zimbabwe rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Kenya ranks 34th and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs Zimbabwe: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/kenya/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/kenya/zimbabwe/">Kenya vs Zimbabwe: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,505 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.