How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Malta?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Iceland vs Malta: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Iceland

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Malta

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Iceland rank

130th

Malta rank

131st

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Iceland
Malta

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Malta, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.4 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Malta ahead.

Iceland ranks 130th and Malta ranks 131st of 139 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 2 and Malta in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Iceland	Malta	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malta
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malta
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malta
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malta
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Iceland
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Iceland or Malta?: Iceland, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Malta as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Iceland and Malta?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Malta?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Iceland and Malta rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Iceland ranks 130th and Malta ranks 131st of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Malta: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/iceland/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/iceland/malta/">Iceland vs Malta: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,505 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.