How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Italy?

38 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bulgaria vs Italy: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Bulgaria

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Italy

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Bulgaria rank

125th

Italy rank

122nd

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Bulgaria
Italy

How they compare

Italy currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Bulgaria, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Italy's figure about 1.1 times Bulgaria's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 38 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Bulgaria ahead.

Bulgaria ranks 125th and Italy ranks 122nd of 139 countries.

Bulgaria has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bulgaria	Italy	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bulgaria
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bulgaria
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bulgaria
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bulgaria
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bulgaria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Bulgaria or Italy?: Italy, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Bulgaria as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Bulgaria and Italy?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Italy?: 38 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
How do Bulgaria and Italy rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Bulgaria ranks 125th and Italy ranks 122nd of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bulgaria vs Italy: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/bulgaria/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/bulgaria/italy/">Bulgaria vs Italy: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,505 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.