How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Zimbabwe?

36 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bhutan vs Zimbabwe: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Bhutan

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Zimbabwe

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Bhutan rank

35th

Zimbabwe rank

33rd

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Bhutan
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Bhutan, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 35th and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 139 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bhutan	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bhutan
1980s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bhutan
1990s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bhutan
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bhutan
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Bhutan or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Bhutan as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Bhutan and Zimbabwe?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Zimbabwe?: 36 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Bhutan and Zimbabwe rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Bhutan ranks 35th and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Zimbabwe: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/bhutan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/bhutan/zimbabwe/">Bhutan vs Zimbabwe: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,505 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.