How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Equatorial Guinea?

31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Equatorial Guinea: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Belarus

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Equatorial Guinea

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Belarus rank

44th

Equatorial Guinea rank

45th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Belarus
Equatorial Guinea

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Belarus ranks 44th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 45th of 139 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Equatorial Guinea	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Equatorial Guinea
2000s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Belarus
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Belarus
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Belarus or Equatorial Guinea?: Belarus, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Belarus and Equatorial Guinea?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Equatorial Guinea?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Belarus ranks 44th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 45th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Equatorial Guinea: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/belarus/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/belarus/equatorial-guinea/">Belarus vs Equatorial Guinea: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,505 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.