How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Namibia?

31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Azerbaijan vs Namibia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Azerbaijan

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Namibia

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Azerbaijan rank

48th

Namibia rank

49th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Azerbaijan
Namibia

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Namibia, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Azerbaijan ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 48th and Namibia ranks 49th of 139 countries.

Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Azerbaijan	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Azerbaijan
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Azerbaijan
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Azerbaijan
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Azerbaijan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Azerbaijan or Namibia?: Azerbaijan, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Namibia as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Azerbaijan and Namibia?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Namibia?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do Azerbaijan and Namibia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Azerbaijan ranks 48th and Namibia ranks 49th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Namibia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/azerbaijan/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/azerbaijan/namibia/">Azerbaijan vs Namibia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,505 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.