How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and North Macedonia?

28 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Armenia vs North Macedonia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Armenia

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

North Macedonia

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Armenia rank

52nd

North Macedonia rank

55th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Armenia
North Macedonia

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in North Macedonia, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.

Across all 28 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.

Armenia ranks 52nd and North Macedonia ranks 55th of 139 countries.

Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Armenia	North Macedonia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Armenia
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Armenia
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Armenia
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Armenia or North Macedonia?: Armenia, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in North Macedonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Armenia and North Macedonia?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and North Macedonia?: 28 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2024.
How do Armenia and North Macedonia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Armenia ranks 52nd and North Macedonia ranks 55th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs North Macedonia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/armenia/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/armenia/north-macedonia/">Armenia vs North Macedonia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,505 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.