How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Cambodia?

45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Angola vs Cambodia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Angola

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Cambodia

0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Angola rank

19th

Cambodia rank

16th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Angola
Cambodia

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Angola, a difference of 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.8 times Angola's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Cambodia ahead.

Angola ranks 19th and Cambodia ranks 16th of 139 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 3 and Cambodia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Angola	Cambodia	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Angola
1990s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Angola
2000s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Angola
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Cambodia
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Angola or Cambodia?: Cambodia, at 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Angola as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Angola and Cambodia?: 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Cambodia?: 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
How do Angola and Cambodia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Angola ranks 19th and Cambodia ranks 16th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Cambodia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/angola/cambodia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/angola/cambodia/">Angola vs Cambodia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,505 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.