How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and China?

43 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Albania vs China: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Albania

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

China

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Albania rank

61st

China rank

64th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Albania
China

How they compare

Albania currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in China, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Albania's figure about 1.2 times China's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 43 shared years of data; in 1980 it was China ahead.

Albania ranks 61st and China ranks 64th of 139 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 2 and China in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Albania	China	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	China
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	China
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	China
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Albania
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Albania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Albania or China?: Albania, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in China as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Albania and China?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Albania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and China?: 43 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
How do Albania and China rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Albania ranks 61st and China ranks 64th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Albania vs China: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/albania/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/albania/china/">Albania vs China: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,505 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.