Sweden vs Tunisia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Sweden
0.6485 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
0.6876 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden rank
101st
Tunisia rank
99th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Sweden
  • Tunisia
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 0.6876 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.6485 1000 USD per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0.0391 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.

Sweden ranks 101st and Tunisia ranks 99th of 139 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 6 and Tunisia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sweden Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.17 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0893 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.08 1000 USD per square kilometre Sweden
1970s 0.9501 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1442 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8059 1000 USD per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 0.9178 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2382 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6796 1000 USD per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 0.9262 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.388 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5382 1000 USD per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0.7109 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5246 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1863 1000 USD per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0.658 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6304 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0276 1000 USD per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 0.6736 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6822 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0086 1000 USD per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Sweden or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 0.6876 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.6485 1000 USD per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Sweden and Tunisia?
0.0391 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Sweden and Tunisia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Sweden ranks 101st and Tunisia ranks 99th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs Tunisia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/sweden/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/sweden/tunisia/">Sweden vs Tunisia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.