Rwanda vs World: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Rwanda
41.49 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
World
1.73 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
4th
World rank
1st

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Rwanda
  • World
01020304050196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 41.49 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.73 1000 USD per square kilometre in World, a difference of 39.76 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 24.0 times World's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Rwanda ranks 4th and World ranks 1st of 139 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda World Difference Ahead
1960s 6.65 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9807 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.67 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 12.42 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.06 1000 USD per square kilometre 11.36 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 17.38 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.08 1000 USD per square kilometre 16.3 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 14.19 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.26 1000 USD per square kilometre 12.93 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 33.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.47 1000 USD per square kilometre 31.53 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 39.25 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.59 1000 USD per square kilometre 37.66 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 41.76 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.68 1000 USD per square kilometre 40.08 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Rwanda or World?
Rwanda, at 41.49 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.73 1000 USD per square kilometre in World as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Rwanda and World?
39.76 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and World?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and World rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Rwanda ranks 4th and World ranks 1st of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs World: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/rwanda/world/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/rwanda/world/">Rwanda vs World: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.