How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Tajikistan?

31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Poland vs Tajikistan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Poland

1.98 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Tajikistan

1.97 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Poland rank

57th

Tajikistan rank

58th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Poland
Tajikistan

How they compare

Poland currently reports 1.98 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.97 1000 USD per square kilometre in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Poland ranks 57th and Tajikistan ranks 58th of 139 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Poland	Tajikistan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	9.03 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.2536 1000 USD per square kilometre	8.78 1000 USD per square kilometre	Poland
2000s	4.91 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.8735 1000 USD per square kilometre	4.03 1000 USD per square kilometre	Poland
2010s	2.84 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.56 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.28 1000 USD per square kilometre	Poland
2020s	2.36 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.85 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.5121 1000 USD per square kilometre	Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Poland or Tajikistan?: Poland, at 1.98 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.97 1000 USD per square kilometre in Tajikistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Poland and Tajikistan?: 0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Tajikistan?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Poland and Tajikistan rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Poland ranks 57th and Tajikistan ranks 58th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs Tajikistan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/poland/tajikistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/poland/tajikistan/">Poland vs Tajikistan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.