Mongolia vs Qatar: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Mongolia
0.0598 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Qatar
0.0661 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mongolia rank
136th
Qatar rank
134th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Mongolia
  • Qatar
00.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 0.0661 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0598 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0063 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Qatar's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 51 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Mongolia ahead.

Mongolia ranks 136th and Qatar ranks 134th of 139 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Qatar Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0123 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0039 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0084 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
1980s 0.0346 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0069 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0277 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
1990s 0.0221 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.005 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0171 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
2000s 0.0307 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0016 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0291 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
2010s 0.0594 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0032 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0563 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
2020s 0.0684 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0353 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0331 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Mongolia or Qatar?
Qatar, at 0.0661 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0598 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mongolia as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Mongolia and Qatar?
0.0063 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Qatar?
51 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Mongolia and Qatar rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Mongolia ranks 136th and Qatar ranks 134th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Qatar: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/mongolia/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/mongolia/qatar/">Mongolia vs Qatar: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.