Malawi vs World: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Malawi
57.03 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
World
1.73 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
1st
World rank
1st

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Malawi
  • World
0204060196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 57.03 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.73 1000 USD per square kilometre in World, a difference of 55.3 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 33.0 times World's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was World ahead.

Malawi ranks 1st and World ranks 1st of 139 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 6 and World in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi World Difference Ahead
1960s 0.8297 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9807 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.151 1000 USD per square kilometre World
1970s 1.76 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.06 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7023 1000 USD per square kilometre Malawi
1980s 2.24 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.08 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.16 1000 USD per square kilometre Malawi
1990s 7.47 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.31 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.16 1000 USD per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 21.29 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.47 1000 USD per square kilometre 19.82 1000 USD per square kilometre Malawi
2010s 39.59 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.59 1000 USD per square kilometre 38 1000 USD per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 55.33 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.68 1000 USD per square kilometre 53.65 1000 USD per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Malawi or World?
Malawi, at 57.03 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.73 1000 USD per square kilometre in World as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Malawi and World?
55.3 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and World?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and World rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Malawi ranks 1st and World ranks 1st of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs World: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/malawi/world/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/malawi/world/">Malawi vs World: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.