Malawi vs Rwanda: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Malawi
57.03 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
41.49 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
1st
Rwanda rank
4th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Malawi
  • Rwanda
0204060196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 57.03 1000 USD per square kilometre against 41.49 1000 USD per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 15.54 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.4 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Malawi ranks 1st and Rwanda ranks 4th of 139 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.8297 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.65 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.82 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 1.76 1000 USD per square kilometre 12.42 1000 USD per square kilometre 10.66 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 2.24 1000 USD per square kilometre 17.38 1000 USD per square kilometre 15.15 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 7.47 1000 USD per square kilometre 13.27 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.8 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 21.29 1000 USD per square kilometre 33.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 11.72 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 39.59 1000 USD per square kilometre 39.25 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.339 1000 USD per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 55.33 1000 USD per square kilometre 41.76 1000 USD per square kilometre 13.57 1000 USD per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Malawi or Rwanda?
Malawi, at 57.03 1000 USD per square kilometre against 41.49 1000 USD per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Malawi and Rwanda?
15.54 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Rwanda?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Rwanda rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Malawi ranks 1st and Rwanda ranks 4th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Rwanda: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/malawi/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/malawi/rwanda/">Malawi vs Rwanda: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.