How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Yemen?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Latvia vs Yemen: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Latvia

0.4108 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Yemen

0.3795 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia rank

113th

Yemen rank

115th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Latvia
Yemen

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.4108 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.3795 1000 USD per square kilometre in Yemen, a difference of 0.0313 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Yemen's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 113th and Yemen ranks 115th of 139 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Latvia	Yemen	Difference	Ahead
1990s	2.74 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.2284 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.51 1000 USD per square kilometre	Latvia
2000s	1.82 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.2694 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.55 1000 USD per square kilometre	Latvia
2010s	1.21 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.3091 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.8999 1000 USD per square kilometre	Latvia
2020s	0.3997 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.3629 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0368 1000 USD per square kilometre	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Latvia or Yemen?: Latvia, at 0.4108 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.3795 1000 USD per square kilometre in Yemen as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Latvia and Yemen?: 0.0313 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Yemen?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Yemen rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Latvia ranks 113th and Yemen ranks 115th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Yemen: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/latvia/yemen-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/latvia/yemen-rep/">Latvia vs Yemen: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.