How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sudan?

12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Latvia vs Sudan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Latvia

0.4108 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Sudan

0.4112 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia rank

113th

Sudan rank

112th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Latvia
Sudan

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 0.4112 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.4108 1000 USD per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0.0004 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 113th and Sudan ranks 112th of 139 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Latvia	Sudan	Difference	Ahead
2010s	1.17 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.3298 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.8392 1000 USD per square kilometre	Latvia
2020s	0.3997 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.4002 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0005 1000 USD per square kilometre	Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Latvia or Sudan?: Sudan, at 0.4112 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.4108 1000 USD per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Latvia and Sudan?: 0.0004 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sudan?: 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Sudan rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Latvia ranks 113th and Sudan ranks 112th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Sudan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/latvia/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/latvia/sudan/">Latvia vs Sudan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.