Kenya vs Sri Lanka: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Kenya
2.37 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
2.28 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Kenya rank
51st
Sri Lanka rank
54th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Kenya
  • Sri Lanka
012345196119922023

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 2.37 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.28 1000 USD per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.09 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Kenya ranks 51st and Sri Lanka ranks 54th of 139 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4413 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.9 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.46 1000 USD per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1970s 0.6074 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.35 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.74 1000 USD per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 0.7446 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.75 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.01 1000 USD per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 0.9764 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.33 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.35 1000 USD per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 1.79 1000 USD per square kilometre 2 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2113 1000 USD per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 2.16 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.39 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2359 1000 USD per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 2.1 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.27 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1655 1000 USD per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Kenya or Sri Lanka?
Kenya, at 2.37 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.28 1000 USD per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Kenya and Sri Lanka?
0.09 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Kenya and Sri Lanka rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Kenya ranks 51st and Sri Lanka ranks 54th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs Sri Lanka: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/kenya/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/kenya/sri-lanka/">Kenya vs Sri Lanka: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.