Japan vs Malta: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Japan
12.89 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
8.93 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan rank
18th
Malta rank
20th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Japan
  • Malta
1020304050196119922023

How they compare

Japan currently reports 12.89 1000 USD per square kilometre against 8.93 1000 USD per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 3.96 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.4 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.

Japan ranks 18th and Malta ranks 20th of 139 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 3 and Malta in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 42.77 1000 USD per square kilometre 26.09 1000 USD per square kilometre 16.69 1000 USD per square kilometre Japan
1970s 23.32 1000 USD per square kilometre 24.25 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9261 1000 USD per square kilometre Malta
1980s 22.42 1000 USD per square kilometre 19.18 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.24 1000 USD per square kilometre Japan
1990s 19.46 1000 USD per square kilometre 36.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 16.55 1000 USD per square kilometre Malta
2000s 16.54 1000 USD per square kilometre 26.28 1000 USD per square kilometre 9.74 1000 USD per square kilometre Malta
2010s 13.87 1000 USD per square kilometre 13.96 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0862 1000 USD per square kilometre Malta
2020s 12.59 1000 USD per square kilometre 9.02 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.57 1000 USD per square kilometre Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Japan or Malta?
Japan, at 12.89 1000 USD per square kilometre against 8.93 1000 USD per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Japan and Malta?
3.96 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Malta?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Japan and Malta rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Japan ranks 18th and Malta ranks 20th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Malta: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/japan/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/japan/malta/">Japan vs Malta: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
140 places, 7,839 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.